HarvestH2o Online Community


PRIVACY: We will not sell, rent or share your name with anyone. see policy


Filtration and Purification

Storage Options

Berms and Swales

FREE Site Analyzer Report





Article Archives
Company Info
Conveyance Systems
Floating Extractors
How To Guides
New Products
Non-Water Resources
RWH Active Catchment
RWH Advanced Info
RWH Basic Info
RWH Calculators
RWH Healthcheck
RWH Incentives
RWH New Products
RWH Nonprofits
RWH Passive Catchment
RWH Plumbing Code
RWH Regulations
RWH Research
RWH Resources
RWH Testimonials
RWH Vendors
System Design Services
Tank Calculations
Tank Sizing
Water Audits - Indoor
Water Audits - Outdoor
US Water Standards
Water Books
Water Conservation
Water Films
Water Quality
Water Related News

Article Listing

Is Rainwater Harvesting a Good Investment
Drip Irrigation Basics
Florida Environmental House
Swales and Berms
Use It Twice - Greywater

Rainwater System Component Articles

Pumps or Pressure Tanks

Pump Sizing

Storage Options

Sample Systems

Free Pumping
Off the Grid

Water Conservation Articles

Tale of Two Cities Rainwater Harvesting in Taos
Water - Why Care
Save Energy, Save Water

Water Quality Articles

Chlorination, Part I
Chlorination, Part II
Importance of pH
Is Rainwater Safe
Potable Rainwater: Filtration and Purification
UV Purification
UV and Carbon Filtration

Water Op Eds:

Climate Change
Greenest Roof
Water - Why Care

Chlorination: Part Two, The Removal

by Stephen K. Wiman, PhD of Goodwater Company, Santa Fe, New Mexico

In regulated municipal water systems, the U.S. EPA Surface Water Treatment Rule (2002) requires that a minimum disinfectant residual of 0.2 milligrams per liter (or parts per million) of free chlorine be present where the
water enters the distribution system and that it be detectable throughout the distribution system. The role of disinfectants in protecting public water supplies is well documented and undisputed, but the reactions of some
disinfectants with some natural materials in water and with other treatment chemicals, and the subsequent formation of unwanted by-products, are of concern. Risk to human health is not clearly documented, but experiments with laboratory animals do raise warning flags and numerous studies suggest the health risks of both chlorine and chlorine by-products to humans.

Some consumers elect to remove disinfection chemicals and disinfection by-products from tap water. Such removal does not itself constitute a health hazard, as your household plumbing infrastructure is a closed system
and you will not be compromising disinfection effectiveness. What method you use to eliminate chlorine, should you choose to do so, depends on what is in your water (check your local Water Quality Report or lab test results
for a well), your contaminant and health concerns, your budget and (sometimes) your space limitations.

Options for point-of-use chlorine removal include carafes and pitchers, faucet-mounted systems, countertop filters, and undersink filters. These systems should be considered as “chlorine plus” filters, and some systems
are limited to little more than chlorine removal. Shower filters are also available to minimize chlorine inhalation while bathing and some showerheads also contain contaminant-specific media for reducing metals in the water.
Distillation systems are also very effective in solving most drinking water problems, but because of their high energy consumption they are not widely popular.

It is imperative to know exactly what the filter system you select will actually remove from your water. NSF/ANSI standards (National Sanitation Foundation International/American National Standards Institutions) represent the
gold standard for water product certification. See www.nsf.org/Certified/DWTU/ to search by manufacturer, reduction claim, type of filter and model name or number. Almost all water filtration products have parts and media certified under NSF/ANSI Standard 61 for Drinking Water System Components – Health Effects. But the critical standards for contaminant removal are Standard 42 Drinking Water Treatment Units – Aesthetic Effects and Standard 53 Drinking Water Treatment Units – Health Effects. Standard 58 covers the contaminants of known health risk. Technically speaking, chlorine is not considered a contaminant by the EPA. See Table 1.

Table 1 NSF Standards
NSF/ANSI Standard Reduction Performance (Performance Data Sheet)
Standard 42 DWTU –
Aesthetic Effects
Bacteriostatic effects, chloramine reduction, chlorine
reduction, hydrogen sulfide, nominal particulate reduction,
scale control, taste and odor reduction, zinc reduction.
Standard 53 DWTU –
Health Effects
Cysts, lead, VOCs (Volatile Organic Chemicals), MTBE.
Standard 58 Reverse
Osmosis Drinking Water
Treatment Systems *
Arsenic V, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium III and VI, Cysts,
Fluoride, Nitrate, Nitrite, Radium 226/228, Selenium, and
TDS plus effectively everything under Standard 53
because of GAC filtration to protect the RO membrane.

*NSF does not certify against Uranium reduction, but post-RO lab testing confirms the reduction of Uranium.

wThe most common method of removing chlorine is by using carbon (often mis-identified as “charcoal”) filtration. Some carbon filters are predominantly made from coal (the use of “iodine content” is a tip-off). But he most
effective chlorine filters are made of GAC (granulated activated carbon) made from coconut shells, a renewable resource which some manufactures are now making with “green” technology (capturing the greenhouse gases
from the ovens used to toast the carbon to create its high volume of surface area).

Activated carbon is effective, but it can provide a base for the growth of bacteria, has to be replaced (or wastefully backwashed) on a regular basis and becomes less effective through time because of channeling. An increasingly popular method of removing chlorine is by whole-house filtration, both using canister filters and tanks. Both methods are limited by the type of carbon used. One method uses in-line canisters (typically 4”x20”) containing
carbon block filters which are changed annually. Carbon block filters are created by compressing very finely pulverized activated carbon in a binding medium and fusing it into a solid block. Carbon block filters can remove
particles down to 0.5 microns and also remove Giardia and Cryptosoridium if present and eliminate the problems of channeling. These filters are so dense that they minimize the potential for bacterial growth.

Other whole-house, chlorine-removal devices are stand-alone carbon tanks used in complex treatment sequences, or tanks which may be combined with embedded electromagnetic devices. These latter systems are
frequently backwashed and may waste as much water as a softener. Dealers make claims that such systems eliminate the need for bottled water (if you have not already eliminated it from your life) but they in no way protect
you from more harmful contaminants which might be of concern to you in both municipal and well water.

Remember that EPA regulations only require public water systems to reduce contaminants, on an annualized basis, below the MCL (Maximum Contamination Level) and at certain times of the year individual contaminants may be near or over the MCL. And if you are on a well, you as the owner are responsible for knowing what is in your water and for electing what (if anything) to remove. Because of the potential for bacterial growth, carbon filtration is often a poor choice on wells except where chlorine is used for specific oxidation applications (such as for Iron, Manganese or Arsenic III) and then removed by carbon block filters typically changed on a scheduled basis.

Table 2
Contaminant Removal by Activated Carbon
Does Not Remove
Active Carbon)
Chlorine taste and odor, Chloramines,
Mercury, Pesticides, Radon (poses accum.
hazard), THMs, VOCs (Volatile Organic
Arsenic, Chloramines, Chromium,
Cysts, Fluoride, Iron, Nitrate,
Carbon Block
AA plus Cysts, Lead and HAAs.
AA. (Must be changed regularly.)

Table 2 is an illustration of what activated carbon filtration does and does not remove. Claims for contaminant removal beyond chlorine and chlorine by-products are often undocumented and highly exaggerated. Many filters
and whole-house systems are “certified to” but not “certified by” true NSF/ANSI standards. Some manufacturers present a self-certified, sliding-scale rating of the contaminant-reduction potential of their products. There is no substitution for independent certification. Caveat emptor.





Rain Harvesting

Xerxes Tanks

Fun Facts


Taking on Water

A Great Aridness

Drinking Water

Tapped Out


ABOUT US -|--FAQS -| -MORE ARTICLES -| -RESOURCES -| - VENDORS |- NEWS-|- NEW PRODUCTS -| SERVICES Copyright © 1990-2022 HarvestH2o, All Rights Reserved 505-603-5498