HarvestH2o Online Community

SECTIONS -|- ABOUT US -|- FAQS -|- ARTICLES-|- RESOURCES -|- VENDORS -|- NEWS -|- NEW PRODUCTS -|- SERVICES
Alternative Water Sources

Review by Doug Pushard

An excellent overview article on the different sources of available water appeared in a recent edition of the Environmental Building News (EBN). The article opens by drawing the case for “alternative sources” due to climate change, growing population and current unsustainable groundwater extractions. It then briefly mentions the need for efficiency and the different uses of water (i.e. potable and nonpotable), but then quickly dives directly into the review of the different sources of “new” water (e.g. graywater, rainwater, air conditioner condensation, mechanical equipment blowdown, treated wastewater, and desalination). Each water sources is reviewed in detail and a table summarizes the pros and cons of each.

Some of the key points made in the article include:

  • Separate plumbing in and around buildings for potable and nonpotable water, opens up significant new options for water supply
  • Rainwater collection or air-conditioner condensate may be possible to aggregate from several roofs and use common storage to improve their economic viability
  • The city of San Antonio refers to the combination of condensate recovery and rainwater harvesting as “rainwater plus
  • Storing rainwater and condensate recovery in one location makes more economic sense. Condensate production is fairly steady, and increases as it gets hotter, and rain is infrequent and intense; by storing together smaller tanks can be used
  • Savannah, GA adopted a regulation allowing graywater to be used for toilet flushing
  • Volcano, HI depends entirely on rainwater for its water supply
  • In large commercial buildings, condensate recovery often produces enough water to supply all of the irrigation needs
  • Desalination is well suited to solar-thermal power plants, due to its energy intensive nature and this approach also addresses some of desalination's negative environmental impacts

The article provides a chart comparing the energy intensity for differing sources of waters for San Diego, CA. Reclaimed wastewater is the least energy intensive, while desalination is the most. Unfortunately, rainwater harvesting was not included in the comparison at all.

The article also includes a table depicting the various graywater regulations around the country. It is apparent based on the table only a handful of locales are actively pursuing graywater as a source today, but hopefully others will soon follow. It specifically calls out Malibu, CA as having a handbook on implementing a graywater system including design criteria for both large and small systems as a good source of information.

Normally EBN articles are only available by buying the past issue (see Money Saving Tip below for saving money on past articles), but this excellent article is available for FREE from the Environmental Building News website and is linked below. This monthly publication features indepth GREEN articles as well as reviews on new products in every issue.

Links:

Money Saving Tip: One print copy of a back issue is currently $23 ($15 plus an $8 shipping and handling per order). A one-week membership ($12.95) s what we recommend to anyone wanting a back article that's not part of the free content -- a much better price that purchasing a single print issue.

TOP

HOME


SITE SPONSORS

Rain Harvesting

Xerxes Tanks



Fun Facts



FAVORITE
WATER BOOKS

Taking on Water

A Great Aridness

Drinking Water

Tapped Out


 

ABOUT US -|--FAQS -| -MORE ARTICLES -| -RESOURCES -| - VENDORS |- NEWS-|- NEW PRODUCTS -| SERVICES Copyright © 1990-2022 HarvestH2o, All Rights Reserved 505-603-5498